Were colonial rulers in India worse than other governments and if so why? To consider those questions, the first part of Benign Imperialism? examines confidential discussions within the Government of India concerning official misconduct, law, and public benefit, particularly in the Bengal Presidency in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Officials debated the purpose and methods of British rule, how to punish civil servants’ misconduct, the relationship between executive and High Court, and the importance of public opinion in India (and Britain). The book also considers these issues by referring to court cases and some British Parliamentary Papers.

Part two turns to policies and local administration, revealing shortcomings including poor focus and police corruption. It assesses the basis of government understandings and describes conditions of village life and the local experience of British rule. The last two chapters look at examples of policies reacting to need and intended to be beneficial, with the longest discussion being about rural irrigation.

The broad conclusion is that there was concern for probity and the public interest but a serious shortfall in performance. Arguably that was for reasons seen in governments of many kinds. It is suggested that that is worrying, given the severe problems faced, especially today.

Contents

Note on References, Transliteration,

Abbreviation and Terms

Introduction

Part I

1. Linking Truth to Duty, Probity to Public Benefit
2. Coercion: The Chapra Case and Others
3. Law and Governance
4. Executive Powers, Courts and Public Opinion
5. Charles Trevelyan: The Penalty for Indiscretion
6. Removing Pennell

Part II

7. Murder in Chur Uria
8. Power and Social Injustice? Studies in Nineteenth-Century Bihar
9. Ideas, Practice and Public Opinion
10. On Water and Development: A Case Study

Bibliography

Index